Political boundaries shown may not be accurate
U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID)
The information displayed is not the latest.

Population (M): 328
Geo. Area (Km2): 963
Irrigated Area (Mha): 23.48
Drained Area (Mha): 47.5
Sprinkler Irrigation (Ha): 14,121,157
Micro Irrigation (Ha): 1,978,879 Major River Basins (Km2): Colorado River and Columbia River
1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
National Committee Directory+
Member : WG-CLIMATE
Member : WG-SCER
Country Profile-
Geography
The United States of America (USA) is a North American country consisting of 50 states, a federal district, and other territories. With an area of 9.8 Sq.Km. it is the world’s fourth-largest country by total area and has a varied topography. The geographic coordinates of the USA are 37.0902° N, 95.7129° W. Canada and Mexico share borders of significant length with the USA. The USA has the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oceans hemming its coastal boundaries. The eastern regions consist of hills and low mountains, while the central interior is a vast plain (called the Great Plains region). The west has high rugged mountains, some of which may be volcanic in nature. Alaska features mountains as well as river valleys. Hawaii’s landscape varies but has somewhat volcanic topography. The capital is Washington, D.C., and the most populous city is New York City.
Population and land use
The population of the USA was 329 million in mid-2019, according to the Population Reference Bureau. The population of the USA represents 4.2% of the total world population. The density of population is about 36 inhabitants per Sq.Km. The USA ranks third among the most populous countries in the world. The most common ethnic groups in the USA are German-American and Irish-American. Most of them migrated from Germany, England, and Italy. African-Americans came from different parts of Africa. Most of the Asian population migrated from South Asia, China, Japan, and the Philippines. Other than these, there are American Indians or Native Americans and natives of Alaska, Hawaii, and other Pacific Islands. It is also composed of Hispanic and Latino populations. Of the total area, about 27% of the area is forest cover, 24% is shrub lands, 17% of the land is agricultural land, 17% of the land forms grasslands and pasture, and wetlands take up 5% of the total area. The rest of the area are urban areas or open spaces.
Climate and rainfall
The USA has a varied topography with mountains, deserts, tundra, grasslands, lowlands, and coastal plains. Like its diverse topography, the climate also varies according to the location. It is considered mostly a temperate country but is tropical in Hawaii and Florida, arctic in Alaska, semi-arid in the plains, west of the Mississippi River, and arid in the Great Basin of the southwest. However, it has a continental climate, with cold winters (often frigid) and hot summers (sometimes very hot), with varying seasonal durations depending on the latitude and distance from the sea. The average annual temperature is 26.4°C or 79.6 °F. And, the average annual rainfall is about 790 mm.
Food and agriculture
The USA contains some of the best croplands in the world. Cultivated farmland constitutes 17% of the land area of the country and makes the USA the world’s most productive agricultural nation. Because of the nation’s favorable climate, soil, and water availability, farmers produce vast quantities of agricultural commodities and a variety of crops. The USA is the largest producer of corn, soybeans, and sorghum, and it ranks second in the production of wheat, oats, and citrus fruits. The United States is also a significant producer of sugar cane, potatoes, peanuts, and sugar beets. Bigger farms, operated as large businesses, have increasingly replaced small family farms over a period of decades. By adopting mechanization, the latest technology, efficient business practices, and scientific advances in agricultural methods, larger farms produce enormous quantities of agrarian output using limited amounts of labor and land.
Water resources management
The water resources of the USA comprise its groundwater, streams, rivers, lakes, aquifers, and reservoirs. Water use in the United States in 2015 was about 322 billion gallons per day (Bgal/d). Freshwater withdrawals were 281 Bgal/d, or 87% of total withdrawals. The saline-water withdrawals were 41.0 Bgal/d, or 13% of total withdrawals. The USA has over 91,000 dams, but most of them are aging and are in a state of disrepair. Many of them have exceeded their estimated life span stipulated by the engineers who built them. The total storage capacity of these dams comes to one year’s mean annual natural runoff, which is equivalent to around 5000 m3 of storage per person. These dams facilitate the production of high value irrigated produce. The longest rivers of the USA include Missouri (2,540 miles or 4087 Km), Mississippi (2,340 miles or 3765 Km), Yukon (1,980 miles or 3186 Km), Rio Grande (1,900 miles or 3057 Km), St. Lawrence (1,900 miles or 3057 Km), Arkansas (1,460 miles or 2349 Km), Colorado (1,450 miles or 2333 Km), and Atchafalaya (1,420 miles or 2285 Km).
Irrigation and drainage
The total cultivated land, which includes arable land plus permanent crops, was 129.52 Mha in 2017. Out of this, the irrigated area was 23.48 Mha, which is about 18.13% of the cultivated land. The total of the drained area in the USA in 2017 was 47.5 Mha. Out of the total irrigated area of 23.48 Mha, the area under sprinkler irrigation was 14.1 Mha, and the area under micro-irrigation was 2.0 Mha. So, the total area under the sprinkler and micro-irrigation was 16.1 Mha, which covers 68.6% of the total irrigated area. Major irrigation technologies used in the USA can be classified into two broad categories: Pressure systems and gravity systems. The types of irrigation under the pressure system include center pivot, surface drip, side roll or wheel move, solid set and permanent, low-flow micro-sprinklers, hand move, sub-surface drip, linear move tower, big gun or traveler, other sprinkler systems, other drip systems, trickle, or low-flow micro-systems. The types of irrigation used under the gravity systems include furrow-controlled flooding, uncontrolled flooding, and other gravity systems.
River basins
There are about 20 major river basins in the USA. The 18 continental river basins are Pacific Northwest Basin, California River Basin, Great Basin, Lower Colorado River Basin, Upper Colorado River Basin, Rio Grande River Basin, Texas Gulf Coast Basin, Arkansas-White-Red Basin, Lower Mississippi River Basin, Missouri River Basin, Souris-Red-Rainy Basin, Upper Mississippi Basin, Great Lakes Basin, Tennessee River Basin, Ohio River Basin, South Atlantic-Gulf Basin, Mid-Atlantic Basin, and New England Basin. The other two major river basins are in Alaska viz., Copper River Basin, and Yukon River Basin. The United States and Mexico share the waters of the Colorado River and the Rio Grande according to bilateral agreements. The International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) is responsible for addressing issues related to bilateral water treaties.
ICID and National Committee
The United States of America (United States Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, USCID) became a member of the ICID in 1951. The past presidents of ICID from the USA include Late Mr. W.A. Dexheimer (1957-60), Late Mr. R.J. Tipton (1966-67), and Mr. M.E. Jensen (1984-87). Former Vice Presidents of ICID from the USA include Mr. W.E. Blomgren (1953-57), Late Mr. R.J. Tipton (1964-66), Mr. W.D. Criddle (1970-73), Mr. M.N. Langeley (1973-76), Late Mr. W.G. Schulz (1978-81), Mr. C.I. Barrett (1981-84), Mr. Larry D. Stephens (1989-92), Mr. M. Bitoun (1992-95), Dr. D.D. Zimbelman (1995-98), Mr. F.E. Dimick (1998-2001), and Dr. Mark Stevendsen (2005-08). Dr. Brian T. Wahlin is currently Vice President of ICID for period 2017-2020. Further, the USCID organized the 3rd IEC in Chicago in September 1952; the 8th IEC and the 3rd Congress in San Francisco in May 1957, the 35th IEC and 12th Congress in Fort Collins in 1984, and the 58th IEC in Sacramento in October 2007. The USCID also organized the 2nd Drainage Workshop in Washington DC in December, and the 3rd Drainage Workshop in Colombus, Ohio. The USCID also organized the 2nd, 3rd and 5th Micro-Irrigation Congress in San Diego, California; Fresno, California and in Orlando, Florida; respectively. USCID publishes its newsletter three times a year and is available at http://uscid.org/newsletter.html.
Events+
Date | Details | Location/Country |
---|---|---|
Sep 30, 2007 - Oct 06, 2007 | 58th International Executive Council Meeting (IEC) NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 Resources : AGENDA ; MINUTES ; MINUTES (French) |
Sacramento, USA, USA |
Apr 02, 1995 - Apr 06, 1995 | 5th International Micro Irrigation Conference Theme - Microirrigation for a Changing World: Conserving Resources / Preserving the Environment NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
Orlando, Florida, USA |
Dec 05, 1987 - Dec 12, 1987 | 3rd International Drainage Workshop NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
Columbus, Ohio, USA |
Nov 18, 1985 - Nov 21, 1985 | 3rd International Micro Irrigation Conference NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
Fresno, California, USA |
Sep 01, 1984 - Sep 06, 1984 | 35th International Executive Council Meeting (IEC) NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
Fort Collins, USA, USA |
May 28, 1984 - Jun 02, 1984 | 12th International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage Theme - Theme: Not Available Question 38: Water management factors. Question 39: Irrigation and drainage of problems soils Special Session - Special Session: Impact of the energy crisis on irrigation and drainage Symposium - Symposium: New developments in the protection of irrigation/drainage and flood control structures on rivers NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
Fort Collins, USA |
Dec 05, 1982 - Dec 12, 1982 | 2nd International Drainage Workshop NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
Washington, USA |
Jul 07, 1974 - Jul 14, 1974 | 2nd International Micro Irrigation Conference NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
San Diego, California, USA |
Sep 01, 1957 - Sep 06, 1957 | 8th International Executive Council Meeting (IEC) NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
San Francisco, USA, USA |
Apr 30, 1957 - May 06, 1957 | 3rd International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage Theme - Theme: Not Available Question 7: Canal lining Question 8: Soil and water relationship in irrigation. Question 9: Hydraulic structures on irrigation and drainage systems. Question 10: Interrelation between irrigation and drainage. NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
San Francisco, USA |
Sep 01, 1952 - Sep 06, 1952 | 3rd International Executive Council Meeting (IEC) NC Contact : Ms. Jane Townsend, Executive Director, U.S. National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID), 1521 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 |
Chicago, USA, USA |
Awards+
# | Category | Title | Description | Winner(s) | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Technology | Benefits of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District's Pilot Pressure Irrigation Project |
A growing population and competing demands for limited water resources prompted California-USA to pass the Water Conservation Act. In addition to a 20% reduction in per-capita urban consumption by 2020, the law required agricultural suppliers to “implement efficient water management practices” and volumetric pricing. With a state-wide assessment of water use underway, the South San Joaquin Irrigation District (SSJID) Board of Directors realized the issue posed a potential threat and approved the Division 9 pressure system upgrade to demonstrate that the district is proactively addressing California’s conservation goals. The SSJID historically delivered water to farmers through 400 miles of gravity-based canals and pipelines. Farmers drew from the network of laterals at scheduled times via flood irrigation or private pumps used for sprinkler or drip systems. While the system worked well for flood irrigation, the combination of flood and sprinkler usage on a single system became problematic. As a result, some customers did not buy water from the SSJID, opting instead to draw from their private, salinity-stricken wells. With the new pressure system, the customers increased and efficiency was improved. The newly approved Division 9 pressure system efficiently managed water delivered by reducing water needs by up to 30% and accounted for water use through magnetic flow meters at each customer connection. A portion of one of the district’s nine divisions – 1537 ha in Division 9 – was chosen as the site for building, testing, and optimizing a pilot pressure irrigation project. The vision for the system included the following fundamental capabilities: Pressurization – pumping water from a 56-acre-foot pond to individual farms through 19 miles of pressurized pipeline Calculated use – letting farmers choose the time, volume, and flow rate of deliveries Automated/mobile access – developing a web-based tool that allows farmers to schedule deliveries from a computer, smartphone, or iPad based on current and past weather forecasts, previous water usage and historical evapotranspiration rates, and orchard moisture sensors. The project consisted of a 19-mile network of pipelines with flexible pressurization (currently set at 60 psi), a 56-acre-foot water storage basin, a 1,225- hp (913482 W) pumping station containing seven vertical turbine pumps capable of pumping a total of 23,500 gal/min (52.4 ft3/s), and a total of 55 solar-powered Field Telemetry Units or FTU’s controlling 77 customer connections. The FTU consisted of a PV panel, a flow control valve, and meter, and a radio-based supervisory control that communicates with a data acquisition (SCADA) system in the pump control room. With the Division 9 pressure system, each customer had one connection point, with a magnetic flow meter to measure and transmit water deliveries; historic data are automatically stored on the district’s server for uploading into the district’s billing software. With the new system, irrigation water was distributed to the customers across 3,800 acres of California’s Central Valley through an automated channel. Using an online system similar to an airline ticketing platform, growers were able to login and schedule water deliveries. Additional information on current and past weather forecasts, previous water usage, historical evapotranspiration rates, and real-time moisture sensor readings were also available on the website. Each farmer selected from available delivery dates and received alerts via email and text message before and after delivery to confirm volume and flow rate data. To promote efficient water usage, moisture sensors placed in the ground on each grower’s property indicated optimal ordering times when orchards were at their greatest need. The survey revealed that the customers received irrigation water at the exact time, flow rate, pressure, and duration they needed. In addition, the reduced number of customers using the gravity system allowed the flood runs to be accomplished faster and more efficiently, with less stress on the previously overloaded gravity system and reduced long-term maintenance costs. The survey data indicates as follows: With the Division 9 pressure system, Farmers were able to irrigate based on surface water availability and crop water requirement, at the exact flow rate and duration they desired. With the pressure system upgrade, the district proactively addressed California’s conservation goals. The system efficiently managed water delivered by reducing water needs by up to 30%. The farmers in the SSJID service area have historically been charged a flat rate of 24 USD/acre for irrigation water. A typical 40-acre orchard has numerous valve structures to flood irrigate the land. This posed a difficult and expensive challenge for the district to comply with due to the thousands of exit points off of the gravity system. However, in the new system, each customer has one connection point, with a magnetic flow meter to measure and transmit water deliveries. The historic data are automatically stored on the district’s server for uploading into the district’s billing software, complying with the Water Conservation Act. The district’s fixed, the 10-day delivery schedule does not provide an optimal water supply at the frequency needed to maximize crop yield. The system’s East Basin Pump Station doubled as a regulating reservoir, storing and pumping irrigation water to 77 customer connections on an on-demand basis, the pressure system induced a demand to convert from flood irrigation to sprinkler/drip application methods. Of the 77 customer connections in the system, 18 installed sprinkler or drip systems immediately after the pressure system was available to serve their land. The increased use of sprinkler/drip increased the irrigation efficiency of the farming operation and contributed to the goal of maximizing beneficial use of the district’s water rights. The system tapped into abundantly available solar energy in the region to meet the power demands of all of the customer connections. The solar system powered the solenoids of the flow control valve, magnetic flow meter, moisture sensors, process logic controller, and radio communications to operate the turnouts and provided real-time information on flow rate, crop moisture conditions, turnout pressure, control, and battery component status, and delivery details (start time, end time, total hours irrigated, average flow rate, total water delivered). The ten-year average water supply (2002-2011) to the Division 9 pressure system customer base has been 7,528 acre-feet. The summation of water deliveries (calculated via magnetic flow meters at each customer connection) through the pressure system for the first year amounted to 4,695 acre-ft. Thus, a 2,833 acre-ft conservation has been achieved. On a water delivered per acre basis, the savings magnified because 50% of the customers of the pressure system were using their wells before the pressure irrigation system. Now, the District was able to re-enrol these farmers and reduced groundwater pumping while higher quality surface water use increased. Before the pressure system, 19,924 acre-ft of water was delivered to Division 9 to support 3,151 acres, or 6.32 ft of water per acre. Water deliveries for the pressure system customer connection for the 2012 irrigation year amounted to 4,695 acre-ft to support 2,389 acres, or 1.96 ft/acre of water. The system reduced the acreage pumping from the groundwater aquifer by 50%. Groundwater pumping in the area was primarily conducted using diesel-driven pumps. The reduction in diesel emissions improved the air quality, and the high-quality surface water improved crop (primarily almond and walnut orchards) health. Farmers participating in the pressure system used the direct injection of fertilizer at their filter stations and delivered chemicals directly to the root zone area; thus reduced the deposition of fertilizer in the local surface and groundwater. To provide a manageable pressure system for both the SSJID and the customers, a user-friendly software interface was developed. Tools at the farmers' fingertips to plan their irrigations included national weather service alerts for the area (including frost and wind alerts), weather forecasts, Doppler radar imaging, customizable and exportable/printable charts on past weather (rainfall, wind, temperature, humidity, evapotranspiration rates), water deliveries (time start, time end, total hours irrigated, average flow rate, and total water delivered), and moisture sensor information. Although data evidence on the increase in yield due to the Division 9 pressure system will take some time, other case studies reveal that farmers will see a 30% increase in yield. With increased control of irrigation timing, duration, and application rate, there has been a marked decrease in pests and diseases associated with water delivery. A major benefit was the consolidation of pumping operations. Due to the new surface water-based pressure system, there was a considerable reduction in the pumping of salinity-stricken groundwater. Farmers reduced flood irrigation and utilized drip, micro, and solid-state sprinklers to irrigate their land which improved crop yield, conserved water by up to 30%, and reduced erosion and deposition of fertilizer into local surface and groundwater. The pilot project showed a marked benefit over the conventional system therefore the same can be extended and replicated to other areas as well.
|
Er. Jeff Shaw and Todd Kotey | 2014 |
2 | Farmer |
Willow Creek basin is adjacent to Willow Creek and the Malheur River in Vale Oregon Irrigation District, USA. Earlier, the irrigation water was delivered to users from the main canal through a complex network of open earthen ditches, established in the 1930s. These open canals dealt with increasing concerns associated with breaches as well as human and animal safety. They also substantially increased operation and maintenance costs. To manage the situation, the Willow Creek Piping Project addressed 35,000 acres (14,164 ha) in the agricultural area and simultaneously worked on water quality and water conservation concerns. Piping irrigation laterals facilitated on-farm conversion to sprinklers, reduced the need for hydro-power, tillage, and fuel usage, conserved water, improved fish habitat, and benefitted the local economy. Some of the major transformations in the Willow Creek Piping Project are listed below:
Before the implementation of the Willow Creek Piping Project, a significant amount of water was lost from seepage and evaporation, especially at the beginning of the five to seven-month irrigation season when the canals were dry. Calculations from the Vale Oregon Irrigation District showed that before the piping project, the first irrigation month’s water loss averaged more than 90% and rarely dropped below 30%. These issues were exacerbated in years when runoff reached below normal levels. In the high-desert region, the average rainfall was 10 inches per year. In low water years, the irrigation district did not receive sufficient water to meet all crop demands. However, under the Willow Creek Piping Project, simply placing piping and burying open laterals prevented virtually all water loss from seepage and evaporation and enabled efficient delivery quantities and measurement. The piping project added USD 6.5 million to the state and federal grants funds to assist local farmers and ranchers in implementing better management practices that protect natural resources, conserve water and improve the water quality in rivers and streams. This project directly provided employment and opportunities for local businesses. In addition, yield increased due to efficient sprinkler irrigation and increased revenues to producers, which in turn helped the local economies of Vale and Ontario. These benefits lasted more than the lifetime of the project. Willow Creek Piping Project essentially replaced the open canal conveyance system with piped irrigation system. This technique can be adopted globally as a water-saving measure. It not only leads to water conservation but promotes environmental sustainability and reduces the dependency on electricity and fossil fuel requirements.
|
Mr. Jerry Erstrom | 2011 | |
3 | Best Paper Award | Reform of user charges, market pricing and management of water: problem or opportunity for irrigated agriculture?, Volume 55.1 |
Keywords: irrigated agriculture; user charges; market trades; water user associations; socioeconomic transformation; South Africa Presented at: 58th IEC Meeting 2007, Sacramento, USA |
Gerhard R. Backeberg | 2007 |
4 | Young Professional | IGRA: Contribution in the field of flow measurement, canal system modernization and operations improvements, debris and fish screening at irrigation diversions, hydrology, and improved hydraulic laboratory techniques |
|
Mr. Tony L. Wahl | 2003 |
Recognized World Heritage Irrigation Structures+
# | Structure | Built | State | River Basin | Irrigation area | Recognised at |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alamo Irrigation System | 1900 | California | Colorado River Colorado River Basin | 479000 acres (193844.423 Ha) | 70th IEC Meeting, Bali, Indonesia, 2019 |
2 | Theodore Roosevelt Dam | 1911 | Arizona | Salt River within the Tonto Basin Colorado River Basin | 248,239 acres (100458.759 ha) | 70th IEC Meeting, Bali, Indonesia, 2019 |
Workbody Representation+
# | Abbreviation | Workbody |
---|---|---|
1 | EB-JOUR | ICID Journal Editorial Board
Mr. Larry D. Stephens (Member), Mr. Kristoph Dietrich Kinzil (Joint Editor), Prof. Saleh Taghvaeian (Associate Editor), Prof. Luis A. Garcia, PhD (Member), Prof. Rameshwar S Kanwar (Associate Editor), |
2 | PCTA | Permanent Committee for Technical Activities
Dr. Brian T. Wahlin (Member), |
3 | WG-CLIMATE | Working Group on Water Resources Management Under Changing Climate (WG-CLIMATE)
Mr. Michael Davidson (Member), Mr. Franklin E. Dimick (Member), Mr. Maurice Roos (Member), |
4 | TF-WWF11 | TF to Guide ICID Inputs to 10th World Water Forum
Mr. Franklin E. Dimick (Member), |
5 | WG-IWM&D | Working Group on Irrigation Water Management and Development
Dr. Brian T. Wahlin (Member), |
6 | WG-SCER | Working Group on Sustainable Coastal Environment Regeneration
Mr. Maurice Roos (Member), Dr. Brian T. Wahlin (Member), |
7 | WG-I&OMVE | Working Group on Institutional and Organizational Aspects of Modernization of Irrigation Development and Management Supported by Value Engineering
Mr. Franklin E. Dimick (Member), Mr. Delbert M. Smith (Member), Dr. Brian T. Wahlin (Member), |
8 | WG-WHMWS | Working Group on Water Harvesting for Managing Water Scarcity
Mr. Franklin E. Dimick (Member), |
PUBLICATIONS/ DOCUMENTS+
MAJOR IRRIGATION PROJECTS*+
Direct Members+
Companies | Institutions | Indiviuals | Dr. Jeffrey Fredericks |
---|